QUOTE (Viktor C @ Mar 9 2009, 21:33)

Quit the riddles and tell me.
I'll tell you something, you are a dick who deserves to be banned. I haven't been on this forum for five minutes, but its always easy to spot your type.
For anybody in need of a history lesson, Dopper was making some over the top claims about Bloodstained Memoirs, which Full Moon came back with "did they eat your dog" or something to that extent - and yes, it was that small. Dopper went on to talk more, and Full Moon raised some issues that he found odd. Dopper vanished without explanation.
Then megabucks and simply phenomenal came out and started saying some slanderous things within the same thread, and as Full Moon was there, within that discussion, corrected them, and also later noted that there accounts looked very similar, there post history was very similar, and it was odd they "both" came on at midnight to moan and hate upon about a documentary, and suggested there was an axe to grind.
Full Moon was accused of being behind the documentary. The natural reply of any guilty ten year old. There was no evidence of this, only that Full Moon had defended the documentary.
Full Moon did some digging, and found out that MegaBucks and Simply Phenomenal (who he accused of being the same person due to all of the links) had shilled a hell of a lot for the Wrestleslam conventions. And this was strong, lengthly shilling. And this also included "name dropping" themselves (Tony, was it?) in other threads with the intention of getting their personal name out there. Megabucks was also found to be plugging a documentary of his own, which by the looks of things, does look as stated elsewhere, a cheap rip off of Bloodstained Memoirs. And don't forget, Bloodstained Memoirs called Tony "ugly" during a write up on their MySpace RE the awful Bret Hart "press release". So that's pretty much enough for me to believe Megabucks / Simply Phenominal is just Wrestle Slam having a massive axe to grind, enough ground to get banned / shamed / ignored.
But Full Moon being Bloodstained Memoirs? I'm not buying it. He hasn't tried to shill a single thing, all he did was note Dopper was acting extreme, then defended some very odd accusations that followed (which anyone would have picked up on there). And I'm not saying this blind, I have searched his posts, and found a few things he has said in the past to clash with other things that are either public knowledge about Bloodstained Memoirs, or can easily be found. And like it or not, Bloodstained Memoirs has a massive fan following. Accusing somebody for being behind it for defending it is as stupid as saying somebody defending the RoboCop film is behind it? With no other evidence whatsoever except for defending a title.
As for the man in question, Victor C. I think he is just a trollish shit stirrer. He clearly has an axe to grind against all things Brit, and the fact that he goes to the degree of calling "Dave Sinott" (a name I had to look up, as it isn't exactly thrown around, so why would he know it so readily?) a cunt, something pretty extreme, suggests to me he is either bitter / jealous of somebody elses success / has an axe to grind, and its as simple as that.
So stop ruining topics with your petty vendettas that nobody talks about!